That was a long title. Phew!
Looking at some teaching books in the church nursery last month, I came across a book about “Susan, Jill, Bobby and Tom Learning about Jesus” (not the real kids’ names, but they were quite old-fashioned nonetheless). It was designed to teach young kids about manners and God and all that stuff kids have to learn. It was near the books teachers use, so I wondered if it was actually part of our Sunday School curriculum. Looking at our curriculum for some of the younger grades, it was simliar. Old language. Old ideas. No wonder kids hate church nowadays. The youngest kids are growing up thinking some words have always meant… what they think it means…
Here’s some bits o’dialogue:
“You look queer today, Susan. Tom isn’t very happy today, but Bobby is having a gay time!” (You’re kidding me…) A lesson on gossip and hurful words.
“Oh Susan, you are such a sweet girl.” (A lesson about sharing)
I think the reason people in general stop going to church is because of the old 50’s image of religion. It’s 2011. Kids don’t say the strange looking lady is queer. Queer means homos3xual to them. To say you’re ‘having a gay time’ to a nine year old would leave questions in their mind on what you meant. Sweet no longer means nice. It means cool, awesome, or to you 70’s folk, swanky, hip.
In our minds, we’re doing something good for the littles of the church.
In their minds, it doesn’t make much sense.
The church has outdated dialogue. To be old-fashioned is not to be more religious. People had their own sets of problems in the 40’s and 50’s. The idea of a homos3xual in church then would make people laugh and wonder why such a person would bother coming. They faced things like world war, nuclear war, and Communism vs. McCarthyism. Adults nowadays then faced the hippies and feminists, abortion and discothèques. We 80’s and 90’s folk experienced desert storm, Dr. Death, Terri Schaivo, Y2K, radical Islam, and Mormon kidnappers. Kids today face postmodernism, liberalism, environmentalism, debt and the decay of the family like never before (polygamy, homos3xuality, single parents). To think kids understand our presuppositions without having experienced them is not fair to them.
Why is our curriculum still picturing kids with a mother at home baking pies in heels, daddy coming home with a briefcase wearing a tie; schools that are teaching God’s word and saluting the flag; and depicting friends that have high morals? Last I checked, mom wore sweats and flip-flops and dropped Baby A at daycare and baby B at school before going to work; dad was either a Mr. Mom with pierced ears or an unemployed man; schools deny the existence of God and indoctrinate over providing education; and friends are the ones doing the main tempting (‘Want some booze? I can get you some.’).
We may be showing them the way things ‘oughta’ be (or the way some people think it oughta be), but are we telling them how to get where we oughta be?
No wonder middle schoolers are leaving.
We teach the Bible like it’s a storybook from long ago.
We leave them with no backbone to stand against the modern dilemmas.
Then all this had me thinking (as you must surely know I love doing) how the church should change it’s approach to things completely.
Not that we should change the gospel.
We should change its presentation.
Updating doesn’t bring postmodernism, liberalism, or emergent theology.
Updating brings the Biblical principles to stand against postmodernism, liberalism, and emergent theology.
Being updated doesn’t mean losing our grip on God.
It also doesn’t mean joining the ranks of seekers and ‘postmodernist/let’s not nail Jell-O to the wall’ folks.
How the Church’s approach in general should change:
Instead of shooting for entertaining, seek to bear as much fruit as possible. Instead of trying to get the wow factor, get the God factor. We should be more concerned with bearing fruit and making sure we are doing good works. We can spend more time on “going into the world” if we aren’t rehearsing lights and sounds.
Not showy productions, but personal touches. Big churches seem to focus on numbers. I come from an independent, fundamental Baptist church where the numbers is always mentioned. We have a board with the numbers of attendees on it, and people point to that as our success. Not so. Are we reaching a faceless crowd or the individual?
Marketing. Why use it? Sure, advert on the radio for the play. Make sure it’s a decent station. But taking time to plan out jingles, plaster up signs, and catering to what people want shows a lack of trust in God to send the right ones to your meetin’. If you market to the world, you will end up with a worldly church. That’s what hooked ‘em, so they expect you to be like that. When it doesn’t quite measure up, they stick around, being their worldly selves, waiting for the fun to start. Unless God has ahold of them, they will probably not change. I’ve seen it happen.
Ear tickling vs. meeting soul’s deep need. You can’t have both. Choose one. When people see something deep, they flock to it. Most people I’ve met not only enjoy deeper meaning: they YEARN for it. I like to ask people who go to church to be entertained “Are you saved to the fun or to the cross?” Blank stare…
Use God’s book, not men’s books, to preach out of. I went to a little church a few years ago that had a pastor preach out of this newspaper clipping on the end of the world. He didn’t say much bout God, but stood up there for 40 minutes proclaiming people were lost and needed Jesus. It didn’t have much impact, as a way to Jesus wasn’t clearly defined. I still remember him standing up at the lectern, hollering away about the Mayans and the Incas and global Islam and the oil crisis and something how it was all predicted in the DaVinci Code.
People want solutions. They want to talk about the issues at hand. Give them the Bible, not ‘the expert’s’ opinion. I would rather have God’s opinion than Joel Olsteen’s. (not that I care for Mr. Olsteen…). Don’t give your congregation (whether it be two little girls or a large Bible study) the world’s wisdom if we’re supposed to be different and separate!
We seem to be pre-occupied with making church seem like a big discussion group. We like to have big stadium-like buildings with oversized warehouse-like pipes and ductwork in the ceiling. Nowadays churches that look like churches (i.e. steeples, pews, altars, stained glass) aren’t cool. They’re outdated. (I want to add that I like “old” churches with pews and hymnbooks. It adds a sense of specialness and uniqueness to worship. But I am not opposed to newer churches. It’s just a design)
There is nothing wrong with meeting in a warehouse. It challenges the idea of normal worship. It reminds us that everything and every place can become a place to glorify God. It may not be the best place, but we can still use it for God’s glory. But when our focus becomes so absorbed in challenging normal and shattering the old-fashioned ways of doing church, we tend to lose sight of the real task at hand: encouraging the believers and reaching the lost.
It may be that the lost are largely postmodern without realizing it. They’re only doing what they know how to do. But what if they begin to question everything they’ve ever known? We’ll get to that question later.
1 Corinthians 1:17 almost sounds like bad doctrine.
(MNT) For Christ did not think I baptized any one else. For Christ did not send me forth to baptize, but to proclaim the gospel; and that not in philosophic words, lest the Cross of Christ should be made an empty thing.
(RSV) For Christ did not send me to baptize but to preach the gospel, and not with eloquent wisdom, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power.
Is it being stated that the gospel can be made of no effect? Can the cross be emptied of power?
Apparently.
It all depends on how you teach. As a preacher, VBS teacher, as a student bible study leader, or as a Bright Lights discipleship leader.
Part 2 tomorrow.
I’d like to note my reason for using 3 instead of the ‘e’ in homos3xual. I respect s3x as a rightful act in union between one man and one woman. It’s a thing taken too lightly today, and for once, I’d like to change the cheapness it has fallen on and make it something to respect. So, I’m going to try my best to uphold it’s sanctity in a way I see fit. Kind of like Jews and their “G-d”.
Part 2 in two days